Infrastructure & grid
Capacity, cost allocation and reliability.
Gretna, Virginia · Serving Pittsylvania County
Gretna timeTHE INFRASTRUCTURE OBSERVATORY
Follow the power, water, land, money and jobs behind data centers. Put operator commitments beside utility records, community evidence and measured outcomes.
ONE FRAMEWORK · EVERY OPERATOR
Capacity, cost allocation and reliability.
Consumption, habitat, stormwater, noise and air.
Additional supply, enforceable benefits and net public costs.
Durable jobs, training outcomes and local supplier spend.
These are Junction’s published editorial weights, not an engineering certification or an official regulatory grade. They total 100 and remain fixed within gj.infrastructure.v1.2026-09-20. Show individual criteria and evidence alongside any total. A serious unresolved safety issue requires separate attention regardless of the total.
VIRGINIA PROJECT WATCH
These are dated source records. Operator pages establish the reported project stage; they do not independently establish resource use, compliance or community outcomes. Every project below is currently unscored.
Chesterfield County, Virginia
Under development — operator reported
Google identifies a new campus under development in Chesterfield County.
Rating: evidence incomplete
Read the operator source ↗Source checked 2026-09-20 · Operator primary webpage
Loudoun County, Virginia
Operating facilities — operator reported
Google identifies its Loudoun data centers and records a 2021 expansion announcement.
Rating: evidence incomplete
Read the operator source ↗Source checked 2026-09-20 · Operator primary webpage
Prince William County, Virginia
Opened 2023; operating — operator reported
Google records opening a third Northern Virginia facility in Prince William County in 2023.
Rating: evidence incomplete
Read the operator source ↗Source checked 2026-09-20 · Operator primary webpage
Boydton, Mecklenburg County, Virginia
Operating — operator reported
Microsoft states that it operates a data center in Boydton.
Rating: evidence incomplete
Read the operator source ↗Source checked 2026-09-20 · Operator primary webpage
YOUR EVIDENCE WORKSPACE
This is your private working assessment, not an audited Junction rating. The same criteria apply to every operator. A promise, an approval and a measured result are different evidence.
Required records: utility, requested mw, phase, connection study, energization conditions.
Required records: tariff, customer contribution, minimum payment, stranded cost responsibility.
Required records: dispatchable mw, duration hours, notice minutes, tested at.
Required records: total mwh, it mwh, measurement boundary, period.
Required records: noise study, traffic plan, backup generation, emergency coordination.
Required records: withdrawal m3, consumption m3, peak day m3, source, period.
Required records: trigger, curtailment plan, alternative mode, supply evidence.
Required records: site acres, disturbed acres, prior use, impervious area, review records, required permit register, permit status by phase, unresolved permit gaps.
Required records: permit, inspection, correction records, control plan.
Required records: scenario date, operating projects, committed projects, proposed projects.
Required records: location estimate, contractual claim, factor vintage, accounting method.
Required records: commitment stage, generation date, contract, attribute tracking.
Required records: recipient, deliverable, due date, funding source, enforcement, outcome.
Required records: gross receipts, incentives, public costs, period, assumptions.
Required records: construction job years, peak workers, permanent fte, contractor fte, wage bands.
Required records: enrolled, completed, credentialed, placed, retained, paid training.
Required records: geography, eligible spend, local spend, vendor qualification, production stage.
Required records: published opportunities, payment terms, accessibility, grievance route.