Gretna, Virginia · Serving Pittsylvania County
Gretna timeTHE COURT RECORD
Presidential cases, Virginia court access and the procedure behind the headlines. Every entry states what the verified document establishes—and where the record stops.
SIX-PART SERIES
Start with immunity, dated Trump case records, local court access and the difference between an allegation, a ruling and an appeal.
These are dated record entries, not a complete live docket feed or legal advice. Open the official docket to check later action.
DOCUMENT · 2024-07-01
Supreme Court of the United States · 23-939
Judgment vacated and case remanded. Historical Supreme Court disposition.
No determination of guilt; no comprehensive current-case status.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
DOCUMENT · 2025-01-09
New York Supreme Court, New York County; U.S. Supreme Court stay application · 71543-23; 24A666
January 3 dismissal request denied; January 6 trial-court stay denied; January 9 Supreme Court stay denied.
Current direct-appeal outcome and subsequent sentencing are outside this verified sequence.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
DOCUMENT · 2024-11-25
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia · 1:23-cr-00257-TSC; ECF 283
Superseding indictment dismissed without prejudice on government motion.
No trial verdict; future prosecution and subsequent litigation not established.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
DOCUMENT · 2024-07-15
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · 9:23-cr-80101-AMC; ECF 672
Superseding indictment dismissed on Appointments Clause grounds; order limited to this proceeding.
No factual acquittal; later appeals and report-release disputes not established.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
DOCUMENT · 1974-07-24
Supreme Court of the United States · 73-1766; related 73-1834
Subpoena ruling affirmed; related cross-petition dismissed as improvidently granted.
Not a criminal conviction of Nixon or universal public disclosure rule.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
DOCUMENT · 1997-05-27
Supreme Court of the United States · 95-1853
Constitution did not require postponing the federal private civil action until the presidency ended.
No factual determination on the complaint; state-court and compelled-attendance questions reserved.
Sources checked 2026-09-19.
Past · Public record · Free to read
The Supreme Court established categories of protected conduct and returned the case for further work. Those steps did not decide guilt.
2026-09-19
Dated record — see the story’s scope notice.
Read the record →
Past · Public record · Free to read
A dated reading of People v. Trump separates the jury’s decision from later requests to pause or dismiss the proceedings.
2026-09-19
Dated record — see the story’s scope notice.
Read the record →
Past · Public record · Free to read
The election case and classified-documents case ended at different procedural points. Neither dismissal was a trial verdict.
2026-09-19
Dated record — see the story’s scope notice.
Read the record →
Present · Explainer · Free to read
Start with the court and case number, then use the judiciary’s own directory and case-information tools.
2026-09-19
Read the record →
Present · Explainer · Free to read
Allegations, evidence, orders and appeals answer different questions. The document type tells readers which question they are looking at.
2026-09-19
Read the record →
Past · Explainer · Free to read
United States v. Nixon, Nixon v. Fitzgerald and Clinton v. Jones concern evidence, official duties and private conduct.
2026-09-19
Dated record — see the story’s scope notice.
Read the record →This publication snapshot records a source, context, rights and presentation review bound to this exact revision. Native revocations and later changes require a new readback before the next publication. It does not rate a public official or policy. Image metadata review does not verify pixels, playback or later changes at an external source.
Reviewed .
Receipt: 63618400-be5a-4445-87af-980c7c14c4c3
Sources and corrections standard →